Kant wrote a treatise 
on _The Vital Powers_. I should prefer to write a dirge for them. The 
superabundant display of vitality, which takes the form of knocking, 
hammering, and tumbling things about, has proved a daily torment to me 
all my life long. There are people, it is true--nay, a great many 
people--who smile at such things, because they are not sensitive to 
noise; but they are just the very people who are also not sensitive to 
argument, or thought, or poetry, or art, in a word, to any kind of 
intellectual influence. The reason of it is that the tissue of their 
brains is of a very rough and coarse quality. On the other hand, noise 
is a torture to intellectual people. In the biographies of almost all 
great writers, or wherever else their personal utterances are recorded, I
 find complaints about it; in the case of Kant, for instance, Goethe, 
Lichtenberg, Jean Paul; and if it should happen that any writer has 
omitted to express himself on the matter, it is only for want of an 
opportunity.
This aversion to noise I should explain as follows: 
If you cut up a large diamond into little bits, it will entirely lose 
the value it had as a whole; and an army divided up into small bodies of
 soldiers, loses all its strength. So a great intellect sinks to the 
level of an ordinary one, as soon as it is interrupted and disturbed, 
its attention distracted and drawn off from the matter in hand; for its 
superiority depends upon its power of concentration--of bringing all its
 strength to bear upon one theme, in the same way as a concave mirror 
collects into one point all the rays of light that strike upon it. Noisy
 interruption is a hindrance to this concentration. That is why 
distinguished minds have always shown such an extreme dislike to 
disturbance in any form, as something that breaks in upon and distracts 
their thoughts. Above all have they been averse to that violent 
interruption that comes from noise. Ordinary people are not much put out
 by anything of the sort. The most sensible and intelligent of all 
nations in Europe lays down the rule, _Never Interrupt_! as the eleventh
 commandment. Noise is the most impertinent of all forms of 
interruption. It is not only an interruption, but also a disruption of 
thought. Of course, where there is nothing to interrupt, noise will not 
be so particularly painful. Occasionally it happens that some slight but
 constant noise continues to bother and distract me for a time before I 
become distinctly conscious of it. All I feel is a steady increase in 
the labor of thinking--just as though I were trying to walk with a 
weight on my foot. At last I find out what it is. Let me now, however, 
pass from genus to species. The most inexcusable and disgraceful of all 
noises is the cracking of whips--a truly infernal thing when it is done 
in the narrow resounding streets of a town. I denounce it as making a 
peaceful life impossible; it puts an end to all quiet thought. That this
 cracking of whips should be allowed at all seems to me to show in the 
clearest way how senseless and thoughtless is the nature of mankind. No 
one with anything like an idea in his head can avoid a feeling of actual
 pain at this sudden, sharp crack, which paralyzes the brain, rends the 
thread of reflection, and murders thought. Every time this noise is 
made, it must disturb a hundred people who are applying their minds to 
business of some sort, no matter how trivial it may be; while on the 
thinker its effect is woeful and disastrous, cutting his thoughts 
asunder, much as the executioner's axe severs the head from the body. No
 sound, be it ever so shrill, cuts so sharply into the brain as this 
cursed cracking of whips; you feel the sting of the lash right inside 
your head; and it affects the brain in the same way as touch affects a 
sensitive plant, and for the same length of time.
Arthur Schopenhauer
       
(Translated by T. Bailey Saunders) 
Existence - system of null-functions activated into partial non-nullity by ignorance.
The Void, of which it cannot be said that it is or is not, nor that it  has consciousness or has none, while it denies absoluteness to any  experiential value (alike to being and to consciousness) cannot be  identified. And that is the doctrine of not-self (anatta) as I see it in  one aspect at present. This voidness cannot be “is-ed” and so  introduced into the worldly scheme, except as the denial of absoluteness  of all particular values. It has no more effect on ordinary life than  the theory of relativity. But just as that theory completely alters  calculation of enormous speeds, so, as I see it, this void-element  completely alters calculations of extraordinary situations, of death (as  killing, suicide or the partner of old age). N.T
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.