Kant wrote a treatise
on _The Vital Powers_. I should prefer to write a dirge for them. The
superabundant display of vitality, which takes the form of knocking,
hammering, and tumbling things about, has proved a daily torment to me
all my life long. There are people, it is true--nay, a great many
people--who smile at such things, because they are not sensitive to
noise; but they are just the very people who are also not sensitive to
argument, or thought, or poetry, or art, in a word, to any kind of
intellectual influence. The reason of it is that the tissue of their
brains is of a very rough and coarse quality. On the other hand, noise
is a torture to intellectual people. In the biographies of almost all
great writers, or wherever else their personal utterances are recorded, I
find complaints about it; in the case of Kant, for instance, Goethe,
Lichtenberg, Jean Paul; and if it should happen that any writer has
omitted to express himself on the matter, it is only for want of an
opportunity.
This aversion to noise I should explain as follows:
If you cut up a large diamond into little bits, it will entirely lose
the value it had as a whole; and an army divided up into small bodies of
soldiers, loses all its strength. So a great intellect sinks to the
level of an ordinary one, as soon as it is interrupted and disturbed,
its attention distracted and drawn off from the matter in hand; for its
superiority depends upon its power of concentration--of bringing all its
strength to bear upon one theme, in the same way as a concave mirror
collects into one point all the rays of light that strike upon it. Noisy
interruption is a hindrance to this concentration. That is why
distinguished minds have always shown such an extreme dislike to
disturbance in any form, as something that breaks in upon and distracts
their thoughts. Above all have they been averse to that violent
interruption that comes from noise. Ordinary people are not much put out
by anything of the sort. The most sensible and intelligent of all
nations in Europe lays down the rule, _Never Interrupt_! as the eleventh
commandment. Noise is the most impertinent of all forms of
interruption. It is not only an interruption, but also a disruption of
thought. Of course, where there is nothing to interrupt, noise will not
be so particularly painful. Occasionally it happens that some slight but
constant noise continues to bother and distract me for a time before I
become distinctly conscious of it. All I feel is a steady increase in
the labor of thinking--just as though I were trying to walk with a
weight on my foot. At last I find out what it is. Let me now, however,
pass from genus to species. The most inexcusable and disgraceful of all
noises is the cracking of whips--a truly infernal thing when it is done
in the narrow resounding streets of a town. I denounce it as making a
peaceful life impossible; it puts an end to all quiet thought. That this
cracking of whips should be allowed at all seems to me to show in the
clearest way how senseless and thoughtless is the nature of mankind. No
one with anything like an idea in his head can avoid a feeling of actual
pain at this sudden, sharp crack, which paralyzes the brain, rends the
thread of reflection, and murders thought. Every time this noise is
made, it must disturb a hundred people who are applying their minds to
business of some sort, no matter how trivial it may be; while on the
thinker its effect is woeful and disastrous, cutting his thoughts
asunder, much as the executioner's axe severs the head from the body. No
sound, be it ever so shrill, cuts so sharply into the brain as this
cursed cracking of whips; you feel the sting of the lash right inside
your head; and it affects the brain in the same way as touch affects a
sensitive plant, and for the same length of time.
Arthur Schopenhauer
(Translated by T. Bailey Saunders)
Existence - system of null-functions activated into partial non-nullity by ignorance.
The Void, of which it cannot be said that it is or is not, nor that it has consciousness or has none, while it denies absoluteness to any experiential value (alike to being and to consciousness) cannot be identified. And that is the doctrine of not-self (anatta) as I see it in one aspect at present. This voidness cannot be “is-ed” and so introduced into the worldly scheme, except as the denial of absoluteness of all particular values. It has no more effect on ordinary life than the theory of relativity. But just as that theory completely alters calculation of enormous speeds, so, as I see it, this void-element completely alters calculations of extraordinary situations, of death (as killing, suicide or the partner of old age). N.T
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.