A number of porcupines huddled together for warmth on a cold day in
winter; but, as they began to prick one another with their quills, they
were obliged to disperse. However the cold drove them together again,
when just the same thing happened. At last, after many turns of huddling
and dispersing, they discovered that they would be best off by
remaining at a little distance from one another. In the same way the
need of society drives the human porcupines together, only to be
mutually repelled by the many prickly and disagreeable qualities of
their nature. The moderate distance which they at last discover to be
the only tolerable condition of intercourse, is the code of politeness
and fine manners; and those who transgress it are roughly told--in the
English phrase--_to keep their distance_. By this arrangement the mutual
need of warmth is only very moderately satisfied; but then people do
not get pricked. A man who has some heat in himself prefers to remain
outside, where he will neither prick other people nor get pricked
himself.
Schopenhauer
Translated by T. Bailey Saunders
Existence - system of null-functions activated into partial non-nullity by ignorance.
The Void, of which it cannot be said that it is or is not, nor that it has consciousness or has none, while it denies absoluteness to any experiential value (alike to being and to consciousness) cannot be identified. And that is the doctrine of not-self (anatta) as I see it in one aspect at present. This voidness cannot be “is-ed” and so introduced into the worldly scheme, except as the denial of absoluteness of all particular values. It has no more effect on ordinary life than the theory of relativity. But just as that theory completely alters calculation of enormous speeds, so, as I see it, this void-element completely alters calculations of extraordinary situations, of death (as killing, suicide or the partner of old age). N.T
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.